🔗 Share this article Moscow Demands Substantial Sum in Damages from Clearing House Regarding Frozen Assets The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking damages totaling $230 billion from the securities depository Euroclear. This action is a clear warning by the Kremlin against plans to utilize frozen Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine. The Financial Lawsuit According to reports in local state media, the monetary authority initiated a lawsuit last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This sum corresponds to the stated $230 billion demand. EU leaders will determine later this week regarding a proposal to use around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to finance its defence and economic stability. The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear acts as the main custodian for the Kremlin's frozen financial reserves. A Clash Over Legality EU officials have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue rests on the fact that ownership of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine. Moscow, in contrast, has called any use of the funds as illegal appropriation. It has threatened reciprocal measures, including seizing European private investors' holdings within Russia. Kirill Dmitriev, who has assumed a prominent position in peace negotiations, wrote on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the plan. Strategic Positioning With statements interpreted as an effort to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the international reserves system created by the United States." The clearing house refused to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past noted it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts. Enforcement Challenges While judges in European nations are not expected to recognize judgments from Russian tribunals, analysts expect Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin. "Russian monetary authorities could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if relevant holdings can be located," commented a legal expert from an international firm. EU Countermeasures EU officials said they are developing measures to discourage other nations from aiding any Russian lawsuits against EU companies. Additionally, they are crafting protections to shield EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation." The Proposed Loan Mechanism According to the detailed scheme, the EU would provide an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds generated from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched. Ukraine would solely be required to repay the money in the event that Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year conflict. Other Funding Ideas The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to examine an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves joint EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unused funds within the European budget. Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered friendly with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection. Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the reparations loan as "the most credible option" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she remarked. "Furthermore, it delivers a powerful signal that when you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."